![the tower of the city](https://www.msn.com/en-in/news/other/greater-noida-consumer-forum-orders-builder-to-refund-rs-554-lakh-for-delay-in-delivery-of-flat/"default":"load":"default","w":"80","h":"45","src":"//img-s-msn-com.akamaized.net/tenant/amp/entityid/BB1dnrts.img?h=449&w=799&m=6&q=60&o=f&l=f","size3column":"load":"default","w":"62","h":"35","src":"//img-s-msn-com.akamaized.net/tenant/amp/entityid/BB1dnrts.img?h=351&w=624&m=6&q=60&o=f&l=f","size2column":"load":"default","w":"62","h":"35","src":"//img-s-msn-com.akamaized.net/tenant/amp/entityid/BB1dnrts.img?h=351&w=624&m=6&q=60&o=f&l=f")
© Presented by Zee Information
Larger NOIDA: The Gautam Budh Nagar District Client Disputes Redressal Fee has sent a sentence in favour of the shopper and has purchased the builder to refund the initial deposit volume of Rs 5.54 lakh since of the delay in providing possession of the flat.
As for each the buyer forums purchase, Lt Colonel Pushpdharan, a resident of Increased Noida, had invested in a two-bedroom flat of 1,050 sq. feet location. The to start with installment for the financial investment was paid by a cheque on April 4, 2013, of Rs 2.77 lakh. Nevertheless, the receipt for the payment was shared with him on April 26. The complainant paid out the 2nd instalment on July 11, 2013, of Rs 2.77 lakh and gained the receipt of the payment on August 6, 2013.
An allotment letter cum consumers settlement was shared with the complainant on January 6, 2014, and in accordance to the arrangement, the builder was supposed to give possession of the flat in 30 months.
On May perhaps 30, 2019, Pushpdharan lodged a criticism with the forum immediately after the builder neither gave possession of the flat, nor refunded the amount. The complainant mentioned that he had invested in the residential task for his daughter’s marriage. The courtroom has despatched various notices and reminders to the builder right before passing the judgement, but the builder neither submitted a penned reply nor abided by the court’s orders.
On Tuesday, Aditya Bhati, representative of district shopper commission advocates welfare affiliation advised Hindustan Times, The district client commission headed by president Anil Kumar Pundir and member Daya Shankar Pandey has decided the grievance ex-parte and directed the builder to refund the deposited quantity of Rs 5.54 lakh, alongside with 9% curiosity. Moreover, the builder has been directed to spend Rs 10,000 in direction of compensation and Rs 1,000 in direction of litigation expenses to the complainant.
The complainant was registered with the consumer fee back in 2013 and until day the resident has not gained the possession, the further mentioned.